Preservation vs. Development

Preservation vs. development. This is the never ending debate in Winnipeg when it comes to urban development. What is better for Winnipeg, preserving the historic character buildings of the Core or modern development? Both sides can present a strong case. What about integrating the two? Red River College has been successful with it's Princess Street Campus and the new Union Bank Tower project.

But does historic preservation hinder the development of urban areas? Winnipeg has a test case that has been ongoing for several years. A few years back a developer purchased land at the corner of Assiniboine Avenue and Fort Street with the intention of building a 15-story apartment building. Apartment construction in Winnipeg's downtown has ceased in the the last twenty years, in which condos have been the construction of choice. Rental units in the Assiniboine neighbourhood are at a premium because of lack of new construction. This development would have increased the population of downtown, something that has been an issue for years.

The only problem: the site for the planned apartment building sat next to the Upper Fort Garry Gate historic site. This site had sat neglected for decades, a haven for graffiti, drug abuse, and wind-blown garbage. All of a sudden when an apartment complex was to be constructed behind the site, the creme de la creme of Winnipeg's elite sprang into action to protect the site. The apartment construction was not going to lead to the demolition of the gate. Why did it take decades for a campaign to reinvigorate the gate to arise?

So after lobbying civic and provincial government, the Friends of Upper Fort Garry put an end to the apartment plan and were able to secure the land for a park development. This has led to tearing down an office building and the downtown's only gas station. The question to be asked is: is this a positive urban development for downtown or has the desire to preserve historic sites hindered positive urban development?

This is an issue that not only affects Winnipeg, but cities throughout Canada. Calgary has a terrible record of preserving its history, but is now in the process of rejuvenating its historic East Village. Halifax and Saint John have done remarkable jobs of preserving their historic buildings. Is there a happy medium that can be reached?

I can't answer the question. If any of you in the blogosphere know anyone who is knowledgable about either side of the debate, let me know. I'm putting together a project of some sorts concerning the issue, so any help would be appreciated.